Skip to main content

guide · last reviewed 2026-07-13

Modern slavery questionnaire response guide

A cautious guide to answering modern slavery and human-rights questions in customer supplier requests.

Summary

Modern slavery answers should be practical, reviewed, and careful not to imply legal conclusions beyond the evidence.

Audience: Small suppliers and advisors. Risk level: high.

Know what is being asked

Modern slavery questions come in distinct shapes, and the right answer depends on which one you received: a request for a formal statement, a policy, a description of your due-diligence process, evidence of training, or an account of how you control your own suppliers. Identify which is being asked before drafting — a policy answer to a due-diligence question reads as evasive even when nothing is wrong.

Use existing evidence

Small suppliers often hold more relevant evidence than they realise: a policy statement, training records, supplier onboarding checks, right-to-work processes, and governance or board minutes touching on the topic. Describe what actually happens in your business rather than borrowing template language written for larger companies — reviewers can tell, and accuracy here matters more than polish.

Escalate sensitive wording

This topic carries legal weight. Statements about compliance with modern slavery legislation, warranties about your supply chain, or contractual commitments should be reviewed by whoever holds legal responsibility before they leave the business. If a questionnaire asks you to certify something you cannot verify — such as conditions deep in your own supply chain — say what you do control and what you cannot yet see, rather than certifying blind.

Source basis

Regulatory or legal conclusions should be reviewed against current official sources before being used externally.

Keep reading

Related resources

More practical material from the resource library.